From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/577 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: those who know me have no need of my name Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Which one shall I choose? Date: 05 Jun 2002 12:08:10 GMT Organization: earthfriends Message-ID: References: <8z5uq9vh.fsf@hotmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138667530 7503 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:32:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:27:48 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!news.ccs.neu.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus,comp.mail.mutt User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Informed Management (RC1), i686-redhat-linux) Original-X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:717 Original-Lines: 14 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 717 Tue Jan 17 17:27:48 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:577 Archived-At: in gnu.emacs.gnus i read: >The impression so far I have is that Gnus is big and complex while >Mutt is small they both `work' just fine. whether one is more appropriate for you depends on a number of factors, most of them so subjective that it can be difficult to judge from discussion. if they are both options i suggest that you use gnus for a while (a week or more), then mutt (if you haven't already) -- and i mean give it a real try, don't try forcing mutt to behave as gnus does nor gnus as mutt, just use them and see what you like. -- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years