From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2146 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Greiner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: [oort] Changed summary format wrt agent undownloaded articles? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:14:52 -0600 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668686 14099 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:51:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:15 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.64.160.47 Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1046410354 26159 198.64.160.47 (28 Feb 2003 05:32:34 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2003 05:32:34 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (i386-msvc-nt5.1.2600) Cancel-Lock: sha1:m/SoeGh/KwqEhu0zXvX5nrL47NY= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2286 Original-Lines: 38 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2286 Tue Jan 17 17:30:15 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2146 Archived-At: Kinkie writes: > I admit it, I'm puzzled. > > I moved recently from oort 0.07 to oort 0.15, and I'm a bit unsettled > by the changed behaviour in the summary buffer wrt articles which have > not been downloaded. > > The color of the lines has changed, and that is fine, but highlighted > buffers are now almost indistinguishable from "normal" articles (the > bold character is gone). That shouldn't be the case. There are three new faces that should only be applied to articles that are undownloaded. For these articles, you should see italic (for low scores), normal (for moderate scores), and bold (for high scores). However, once an article has been downloaded you should see your usual color scheme. > Also, gnus-summary-next-unread-article (aka > "n") doesn't skip over undownloaded articles anymore, which to me > means that reading them is a more difficult. > > Is this intentional, the result of some not-completely-wanted changes, > and is it possible to configure something in order to undo it? I believe that it was deliberate. At least, one of the new hook functions depends on this behavior. To be honest, I'm not sure how it came about. I peeked under the hood and, from what I can tell, you can not turn this behavior off. As for your comment that the new behavior makes them more difficult to read. You might want to investigate adding gnus-agent-fetch-selected-article to the gnus-select-article-hook. That way, should you select an undownloaded article it will automatically be downloaded. Kevin