On Fri, Jun 07 2002, Kai Großjohann wrote: > D. Goel writes: > >> Provide an alternative to S W which includes *both* from: and >> reply-to:'s. > Does `S V' do it? No (and I couldn't find any predefined functionality for doing this): ,----[ original message ] | From: from@some-where.invalid | To: to@some-where.invalid | Cc: cc@some-where.invalid | Reply-To: reply-to@some-where.invalid `---- ,----[ S V ] | To: reply-to@some-where.invalid | Cc: to@some-where.invalid, cc@some-where.invalid `---- > I have no idea. It's called `very wide', but I don't know what's > `very' about it. You tell me :-) When you process mark multiple articles `S V' (and `S v') will send the message to _all_ involved persons (From or Reply-To, Cc, To) in _all_ marked articles. With `S V', all messages are quoted. It's similar, but not the same as `F' (with process marked articles). Unlike `F', `S V' puts the MID's (and References) from *all* messages into the new References header (feature or bug?). `S W' only cites all marked articles, but the recipients are taken only from the first marked article. See . BTW, there's a typo in this node: