Re: Recursive scoring or articles

[Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>]

On Sun, Jul 29 2007, Sebastian Krause wrote:

> 1. [ interesting post ]
> 2.    [ troll A answers ]
> 3.       [ posting feeding the troll ]
> 4.       [ more food ]
> 5.           [ another troll ]
> 6.    [ good answer ]
> 7.    [ another good answer ]
>
> Now let's assumene I've already killed troll A in my score
> file.

I.e. you already have a rule like this?

 ("from"
  ("some troll" -10000 nil s))

> Since the troll-feeding posts will just be as annoying, lines 3-5
> should be *automatically* killed together with line 2.

Adding this rule should help:

 ("followup"
  ("some troll" -10000 nil s)

,----[ (info "(gnus)Score File Format") ]
|          "Followup"
|                This match key is somewhat special, in that it will
|                match the `From' header, and affect the score of not
|                only the matching articles, but also all followups to
|                the matching articles.  This allows you e.g. increase
|                the score of followups to your own articles, or decrease
|                the score of followups to the articles of some known
|                trouble-maker.  Uses the same match types as the `From'
|                header uses.  (Using this match key will lead to
|                creation of `ADAPT' files.)
`----

If the troll is nice enough to use it's own FQDN, you may score on
(message-id and) references:

 ("message-id"
  (".ln1@usenet.de.gg>" -1000 nil r))

 ("references"
  ("@trolls\\.fqdn\\.invalid>[^>]+>[^>]+>$" -1 nil r)
  ("@trolls\\.fqdn\\.invalid>[^>]+>$" -10 nil r)
  ("@trolls\\.fqdn\\.invalid>$" -100 nil r)

> So I would see this result in the summary buffer without any manual
> interaction:
>
> 1. [ interesting post ]
> 2.    [ good answer ]
> 3.    [ another good answer ]

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/