From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4196
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Reiner Steib <reinersteib+from-uce@imap.cc>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: [Q]: Long lines, wrapping ...
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:29:18 +0200
Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm
Message-ID: <v9wtxk1cgx.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
References: <plop877jpljx2q.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
Reply-To: Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670179 22274 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:16:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:16:19 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:23 2006
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg;N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S
 /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?>
 WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RRZVu8zyMmbvXhJJOmpjnBwTjug=
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de
Original-X-Trace: news.uni-ulm.de 1098361807 134.60.10.173 (21 Oct 2004 14:30:07 +0200)
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!news.equant.no!news.tdcnorge.no!gatel-ffm!gatel-ffm!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!inka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.uni-ulm.de!lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de!not-for-mail
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4337
Original-Lines: 23
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4337   Tue Jan 17 17:33:23 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4196
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4196>

On Wed, Oct 20 2004, Xavier Maillard wrote:

> I also have seen the variable `gnus-treat-fill-article' and
> `gnus-treat-fill-long-lines' which if I understand correctly tell
> over functions to do automatic processing on article.
>
> What is the best to use ? 

It depends on the type of correction the article needs.  Either `W Q'
or `W w' can be appropriate:

`W Q' is for article where the author has forgotten to hit return which will result in very very very loooooooooooooooooooong lines.

`W w' is 
nice for strangely 
formated stuff
like this.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/