From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/500 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: bbdb and searching Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 11:45:26 +0200 Organization: University of Dortmund, Germany Message-ID: References: <87wutztdus.fsf@easynet.be> <87n0uvt636.fsf@easynet.be> <871yc6e62y.fsf@easynet.be> <87off9hflk.fsf@easynet.be> <87it5h2t8o.fsf@easynet.be> <87hel084uh.fsf@easynet.be> <873cwj57c4.fsf@easynet.be> <874rgy8sar.fsf@easynet.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138667481 7202 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:31:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:27:41 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!lackawana.kippona.com!stargate.gts.cz!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news.uni-dortmund.de!Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7JNs1fiFgGUN3Y4uFmsxSr1HYzI= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:640 Original-Lines: 28 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 640 Tue Jan 17 17:27:41 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:500 Archived-At: remi.letot@easynet.be (Rémi Letot) writes: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai writes: > >> remi.letot@easynet.be (Rémi Letot) writes: >> >>> Still no match :-( >> >> Then it's probably the new BBDB version. Sorry for wasting your time. > > You didn't waste my time. Is the new bbdb version usable without > problems ? If you don't experience the problem I describe, I might > consider switching. Well, I encountered some problems related to bbdb-file-coding-system, but other than that, 2.35 seems worthwhile. I'm not exactly sure what were the "problems" I alluded to above. Might as well have been a mistake on my part. I noticed something strange. Maybe the strangeness was that BBDB asked me again and again to change Kai Großjohann to Kai Großjohann (from Latin-1 to Latin-9, I guess), even after I had accepted the change and saved BBDB. Then I started to mess with the encoding myself, and of course now I'm responsible for any damage this might have caused. kai -- Silence is foo!