Re: Keeping interesting messages

[Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)]

Paul Moore <gustav@morpheus.demon.co.uk> writes:

> [[BTW, this raises a separate question - is there any sense in
> splitting my nnml method into two - one for mailing lists, where
> total-expire is on for all groups, and one for personal mail, where
> expiry is on a manual basis? I can see it being useful to make a clear
> distinction between the two use cases, but is the inconvenience of
> using two methods sufficient to make this a bad idea?]]

The mail-sources code currently only allows a single server to
receive mail.  While it would be possible to circumvent that, it
would be a hassle.

With two different servers, you could distinguish between the
nnml+ml:foo groups (for mailing lists) and the nnml+pm:foo groups
(for personal mail).

But with one server, you can distinguish between nnml:ml.foo and
nnml:pm.foo which IMHO is just as good.  What do you think?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop 3p!sdn    (Frank Nobis)