* Splitting into Maildir folder
@ 2002-06-03 8:48 Edvard Majakari
[not found] ` <vafn0uc90hz.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edvard Majakari @ 2002-06-03 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
Greetings!
Recently I ran into SpamAssassin. Having used that for some time I quickly
became very fond of that piece of software. It seems to identify spam
quite easily, and so I created a procmail script that uses SpamAssassin
according to instructions given.
Now, with procmail, I'm able to use two alternative methods for splitting
mail. I can put all incoming spam into mbox file, or Maildir directory (of
course, /dev/null is possible, but SpamAssassin may sometimes have
positive false results. So I use mbox of Maildir.
Of course, I could just filter all mail via SpamAssassin and make Gnus
identify spam by headers that SpamAssassin inserts, but I don't want to
see first that hey, I've got ten new messages only to find that 9 out of
10 are spam.
The problem is, how do I create a group in Gnus that is actually in mbox
or Maildir format? I'm quite sure Gnus is able to do this, I only don't
know how :)
FWIW, I created two simple zsh functions to first identify new spam
domains and second script to insert those new domains to Postfix's
header_checks file (that is able to handle regexps) so that at least in
theory, I should never receive spam from the same domain twice. I can send
those scripts and/or domain blacklists gathered so far with SpamAssassin
if anybody's interested.
--
# Edvard
By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one
to another -- John 13:35
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Splitting into Maildir folder
[not found] ` <87vg8zjrf2.fsf@samuel.pampltd.com>
@ 2002-06-04 10:47 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-06-04 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
Edvard Majakari <edvard.majakari@pampltd.com> writes:
> I resorted to the first suggested method. What would be the
> advantages for using this last method? doesn't the first method copy
> the mail as well as munge some headers, whereas the last would
> simply read the dir directly, thus avoiding somewhat expensive disk
> copy?
nnmaildir has some nice features. For example, it's easy to share a
maildir with your colleagues (in the sense that you read/write the
same directory). You can specify which marks are per-user and which
marks will shared by users. So for example you can make it so that
ticking a message is seen by everybody whereas marking it as dormant
is only seen by you.
nnmaildir also tries to be fast, I think. Maybe it's faster even (for
some operations) than nnml?
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-04 10:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-03 8:48 Splitting into Maildir folder Edvard Majakari
[not found] ` <vafn0uc90hz.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
[not found] ` <87vg8zjrf2.fsf@samuel.pampltd.com>
2002-06-04 10:47 ` Kai Großjohann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).