* Re: posting styles not updated
[not found] ` <vafpu02wtgl.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
@ 2002-05-11 20:36 ` Rémi Letot
[not found] ` <vafheles7xk.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rémi Letot @ 2002-05-11 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> The order of styles is important. I'm not sure if the .* style has
> to come first or has to come last, but I'm sure the docs say which
> one it is. If the .* style is in the wrong position, it will always
> be used, even when there are more specific styles.
The doc says to put .* in first position, and that's what is in my
config file. Now I discovered some other things :
when I reply to most posts in that list, the correct posting style is
used. And then it is also used when I try to compose a message from
scratch (using 'm') instead of the .* style.
Now on some message in the list, when I answer them, the list's
posting style is not used. Although the "To" header matches the
posting style, the .* one is used. And then the .* one is used for
subsequent mails (using 'm').
It seems I have two problems here : first one is that composing a mail
with 'm' uses the last used posting style. Second is that replying to
some posts in the list takes the .* posting-style although it should
match the other one.
Does that make sense ?
--
Rémi Letot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: posting styles not updated
[not found] ` <vafheles7xk.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
@ 2002-05-11 22:33 ` Rémi Letot
2002-05-12 10:29 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rémi Letot @ 2002-05-11 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> remi.letot@easynet.be (Rémi Letot) writes:
>
>> Now on some message in the list, when I answer them, the list's
>> posting style is not used. Although the "To" header matches the
>> posting style, the .* one is used. And then the .* one is used for
>> subsequent mails (using 'm').
>
> Hm. Maybe it's best to use posting styles on a per-group basis,
> rather than based on the headers.
Great, that fixed it, thanks. Now everything now seems to work fine,
and I can set it up for my other groups.
> When you get a message A and compose a reply B, the headers that
> posting styles will look at are those from message A, not B! This is
> confusing.
Thanks for the info. But that doesn't explain why some "To" headers
weren't matched. Anyway now I do it by group names.
Thanks,
--
Rémi Letot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: posting styles not updated
2002-05-11 22:33 ` Rémi Letot
@ 2002-05-12 10:29 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-05-12 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
hobbes@easynet.be (Rémi Letot) writes:
> Thanks for the info. But that doesn't explain why some "To" headers
> weren't matched. Anyway now I do it by group names.
I'm always confused by posting styles, so I'm not the right person to
help, here. Sorry. Anyone?
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-12 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87bsbnu367.fsf@easynet.be>
[not found] ` <vafpu02wtgl.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
2002-05-11 20:36 ` posting styles not updated Rémi Letot
[not found] ` <vafheles7xk.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
2002-05-11 22:33 ` Rémi Letot
2002-05-12 10:29 ` Kai Großjohann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).