From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/887 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uri Guttman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: gnus and RT ticket threads Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 20:40:37 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138667764 8825 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:36:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:28:15 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!news.ccs.neu.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet01.sei.cmu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc03.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Sender: uri@mail.sysarch.com Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.124.101 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com Original-X-Trace: sccrnsc03 1028839237 66.31.124.101 (Thu, 08 Aug 2002 20:40:37 GMT) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 20:40:37 GMT Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:1027 Original-Lines: 28 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 1027 Tue Jan 17 17:28:15 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:887 Archived-At: >>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann writes: KG> Uri Guttman writes: >> rt (a request ticket tracker - http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) >> supports tickets via email. it doesn't generate any references headers >> but it does generate in-reply-to headers KG> Gnus uses the In-Reply-To header by default if References is KG> missing. So something else must be wrong... i noticed that the initial rt ticket message has '[autoreply]' in the subject but the followups don't but they have Re: in there. and i found this: gnus-cite-reply-regexp's value is "^\\(Subject: Re\\|In-Reply-To\\|References\\):" so it may be that the subject: Re is being found first and the subject doesn't match due to the [autoreply]. so i could rearrange that so the In-Reply-To comes first. sound like a plan? thanx, uri -- Uri Guttman ------ uri@stemsystems.com -------- http://www.stemsystems.com ----- Stem and Perl Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding ---- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org