From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/6918 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alberto L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: No Gnus 0.3 slower than Oort Gnus 0.24 spam handling Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:33:09 -0800 Organization: No organization Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142624443 30837 80.91.229.2 (17 Mar 2006 19:40:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 17 20:40:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKKo7-0001py-6G for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:40:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKKo6-0006Ij-DV for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:40:18 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Cancel-Lock: sha1:SU6UcCUd6uCnNlfNLHme8hhylfY= Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com Original-Lines: 56 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:77102 Original-To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:6918 Archived-At: Hi all, I recently upgraded from Oort 0.24 to No 0.30 and my spam handling has become quite slow. Here is my situation: - I use nnfolder mail storage my spam handling configuration (using bogofilter): - splits spam into mail.spam.temp - on exiting, spam in all groups is moved to mail.spam.save - mail.spam.temp and mail.spam.save are spam groups - the spam process destination for mail.spam.save is nil When I enter mail.spam.temp to check for false spam positives, on quitting it all spam-marked messages are moved to mail.spam.save. This is quite slower with No 0.30 w.r.t. Oort 0.24 because, apparently, both mail.spam.temp and mail.spam.save are written to disk each time a single message is moved. With Oort 0.24 as far as I can understand both groups are written to disk only once. I include some bits of my spam configuration: (setq spam-split-group "mail.spam.temp" spam-junk-mailgroups '("mail.spam.temp" "mail.spam.save") gnus-spam-process-newsgroups '( ("^mail\\.incoming\\.....-..-..$" ((spam spam-use-bogofilter))) ("^mail\\.spam\\.train$" ;; ((spam spam-use-blacklist)) ;; ((ham spam-use-whitelist)) ((ham spam-use-bogofilter)) ((spam spam-use-bogofilter))) ("^mail\\.spam\\.save$" ((ham spam-use-bogofilter))) ) gnus-spam-process-destinations '( ("^mail\\.spam\\.save$" nil) ("^mail\\..*$" "mail.spam.save") ) gnus-ham-process-destinations '( ("^mail\\.spam\\..*$" "mail.incoming.nospam") ) ) Greetings, -- Alberto