From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6JC3qmA029672 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:03:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6z0X6tl5 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:03:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:03:26 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Nested displays? Message-ID: <20100719120350.GI30454@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> References: <4C443A36.6090201@bsd.lv> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C443A36.6090201@bsd.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 01:42:46PM +0200, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote: > Hi, > > Can anybody think of a reason why display types (`Bd', `D1', `Dl') > shouldn't be nested? Enclosed is a patch that downgrades the message to > ERROR (from FATAL) and lets these through. > well, it doesn;t make sense to nest displays, does it? i can;t think of why you would ever want to. don;t tell me we have examples of this in our pages... jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv