From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.sonnenberger.org [92.79.50.50]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6JGsin3002627 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474246676C for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3851D150A3; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:48:11 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Nested displays? Message-ID: <20100719164810.GA1452@britannica.bec.de> References: <4C443A36.6090201@bsd.lv> <20100719120350.GI30454@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100719120350.GI30454@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 01:03:26PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 01:42:46PM +0200, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can anybody think of a reason why display types (`Bd', `D1', `Dl') > > shouldn't be nested? Enclosed is a patch that downgrades the message to > > ERROR (from FATAL) and lets these through. > > > > well, it doesn;t make sense to nest displays, does it? i can;t think of > why you would ever want to. don;t tell me we have examples of this in > our pages... I remember at least one example of hitting nesting displays ;) Joerg -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv