From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o76INU8A032298 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:23:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id NcyE0Uz4 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:23:05 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:23:05 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: -column issue Message-ID: <20100806182329.GC946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> References: <20100806070614.GD2107@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C5C417B.4050209@bsd.lv> <20100806175200.GB946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C5C50C2.7080304@bsd.lv> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5C50C2.7080304@bsd.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:13:22PM +0200, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote: > > > >Second level name Type Changeable > >FS_POSIX_SETUID No integer yes > > > >i.e. it does not parse "No". mandoc does not display the "No". same if i > >move the "No" into the next column (which seems more logical). > > Jason, I can't replicate this. Enclosed is the input (so as to preserve > the tabbing...). I tested with OpenBSD and a new groff. Do you still > see this behaviour? > > Kristaps hmm. so the reason was that you used "No", where i used "No". and the extra space is as you explained previously about lining up the columns correctly, and the way mandoc handles -column lists, yes? so, it seems non-intuitive. i would expect to do sth like this: FS_POSIX_SETUIDNointegeryes mandoc handles it, but groff does not. sigh. so, do you recommend i "fix" sysctl.3? jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv