From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o83JSXsK005588 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:28:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bqvKYRvy for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:28:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:28:07 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: EXIT STATUS for section 6 Message-ID: <20100903192831.GB18815@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> References: <20100903125743.GG9076@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <20100903162905.GF6084@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100903162905.GF6084@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:29:05PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:57:19PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > the templates say EXIT STATUS is for sections 1 and 8. the descriptions > > of EXIT STATUS say it is for sections 1, 6, and 8. which is it? > > Section 6 are games, so they could have an EXIT STATUS. > could have, yeah. but don't. > > openbsd has no exit status info in any of its section 6 pages. ok? > > Well, I thought you're only introducing EXIT STATUS in the OpenBSD man > pages? :) > yeah. but i downcased EXIT STATUS - i meant none of the section 6pages have any info about what they return. > Anyway, i don't see any EXIT STATUS in man6/* on NetBSD either. > > I think we should allow it for section 6 as well, but I don't care > much either way. right, so which way do we fall. section 6 ok or not? i don't care. jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv