From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Debian-exim@smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o85I3nBD023675 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1OsJZD-0008Ml-LH; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:03:47 +0200 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJZD-0000nR-KB for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:03:47 +0200 Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJZD-0007qu-JU for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:03:47 +0200 Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJZD-0002wa-If for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:03:47 +0200 Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 20:03:47 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Bl+Pp still causing double spacing Message-ID: <20100905180347.GD351@iris.usta.de> References: <20100904160751.GD27159@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100904160751.GD27159@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Hi Jason, Jason McIntyre wrote on Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:07:27PM +0100: > i thought this had been fixed, but it's still happening. > for reference, see openbsd's azalia(4) page. > > basically it has a list like this: > > .Pp > .Bl -tag -width blah > .It blah > .Pp > .It blah > .Pp > .It blah > .El > > mandoc generates double blank lines between list entries when it should > really ignore the Pp's. I consider that a known bug in mandoc. See the following entry in the TODO list: - A bogus .Pp between two .It must not produce a double blank line, see between -R and -r in OpenBSD rm(1), before "update" in mount(8), or in DIAGNOSTICS in init(8). > i'm going to zap the .Pp because it's all useless, Yes, zapping that is fine. > but regardless, mandoc should not be generating double blanks, > no? Yes, in this case, double blanks are wrong. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv