From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8B7kQC8010103 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 03:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id hKLPwDLi for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:46:00 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:46:00 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: WARNING: blocks badly nested: Oc breaks Op Message-ID: <20100911074624.GC5369@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i hi. pfctl(8) contains this snippet: .Xo .Oo Fl t Ar table .Fl T Ar command .Op Ar address ... Oc .Xc mandoc is not happy about having a ".Op ... Oc" line and warns: pfctl.8:56:20: WARNING: blocks badly nested: Oc breaks Op but is that fair? of course i can move the Oc to a separate line, but why should i? jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv