From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.sonnenberger.org [92.79.50.50]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8HAo0Zb027911 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:50:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B74D667C3 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:49:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AE1D117EC9; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:50:11 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: WARNING: blocks badly nested: Oc breaks Op Message-ID: <20100917105010.GB7536@britannica.bec.de> References: <20100911074624.GC5369@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <20100916212333.GB5462@usta.de> <20100916222747.GB30810@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100916222747.GB30810@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:27:23PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > i don;t totally understand. Oo/Oc need not happen on the same line, so i > consider it fair game that i can stick Oc on the end of an Op line. Your example did not put the Oc on a separate line from the Op. So yes, there is a difference between .Oo .Op ... .Oc and .Oo .Op .. Oc and as Ingo mentioned, as soon as you replace .Op with .Sq for example, it becomes obvious. Joerg -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv