discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason McIntyre <jmc@kerhand.co.uk>
To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv
Subject: Re: more spacing badness
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:08:54 +0059	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922070918.GB22622@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100921230513.GC9516@iris.usta.de>

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:05:13AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> 
> > My last commit fixes this in a general way.  The problem was "\ \&"
> > being read as the string length.  Now string length calculations (for
> > -Tascii, -Tpdf, and -Tps) all take into account escapes.  This lifts a
> > long-standing feature request in the TODO.
> 
> WOW, great.
> I wouldn't have thought that could be done with so little code.
> 
> Admittedly, it's a bit of code duplication, but by far less annoying
> than i would have expected.  And it's very nice to have from a
> user perspective.  Thanks!
> 

not only that, but somewhere along the way the SYNOPSIS for test(1) got
fixed! now we have:

	[ test ]
instead of
	[    test ]

not only that, but the -column alignments in sysctl(3) got fixed
somewhere along the way too.

super!

> 
> Of course, i was eager to see whether Jason's "vi\ \&" would now work.
> Guess what - it didn't.  I first had to fix *two* bugs in my own code.
> 
> First, my favourite function term_flushline() handled trailing white
> space correctly, but not trailing escaped blank characters.  In the
> initial parsing loop, escaped whitespace is counted as normal
> characters, then in the final output loop, it gets converted to
> normal blanks, and finally, normal blanks (which break out of the
> initial parsing loop) are counted again, so trailing escaped blanks
> ended up being counted twice against the column width.
> 
> Having fixed that one, Jason's "vi\ \&" still wouldn't work.
> The reason was a quirk implemented for mdoc's .Bl -hang lists.
> In such lists, when the head is wider than the declared head
> width, the body gets pushed ahead to make room for the head;
> when the head is shorter, the body gets aligned at the declared
> position.  The quirk being that when the head is exactly one
> character shorter than the declared width, the body gets pulled
> back one character - for whatever reason.  That quirk got triggered
> and defeated Jason's nicely escaped blank.
> 
> So, the second fix is to remove the -hang flag from the SYNOPSIS
> .Nm block handling.  I don't remember why i put that flag there
> in the first place, it is clearly not needed.  The width is
> calculated such that the header will always fit, so pushing ahead
> is never needed, and we certainly do not want to pull back.
> 
> OK?
> 

with this my vi hack does work correctly. thanks.

jmc
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-22  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-10 21:14 Jason McIntyre
2010-09-15 15:53 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-09-21 23:05   ` Ingo Schwarze
2010-09-22  7:09     ` Jason McIntyre [this message]
2010-09-22  8:11       ` Kristaps Dzonsons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100922070918.GB22622@bramka.kerhand.co.uk \
    --to=jmc@kerhand.co.uk \
    --cc=discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).