From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8P6Znbr024617 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:35:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id G4k450i1 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:35:23 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:35:23 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: .Fn _* issue Message-ID: <20100925063547.GB14869@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i hi. the source, from cacheflush(3): .Sh SYNOPSIS .In machine/sysarch.h .Ft int .Fn cacheflush "void *addr" "int nbytes" "int cache" .Ft int .Fn _flush_cache "char *addr" "int nbytes" "int cache" formats as: SYNOPSIS #include int cacheflush(void *addr, int nbytes, int cache); int _flush_cache(char *addr, int nbytes, int cache); so the issue is the initial `_' in _flush_cache. it's formatted in a different font to the rest of the function name (you can see this best on a terminal). this is a long standing bug that we always had in old groff, which really annoyed me. new groff fixed it. jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv