From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kerhand.co.uk (_smtpd@82-69-137-214.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.137.214]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9TCmxpw002425 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1288356537.Y5WdJYm81LB4q4xc for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:48:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:48:33 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Fn issue Message-ID: <20101029124857.GB13301@kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i hi. not sure if this is known or not (can;t see anything in the list that suggests it is). source, from rpc.3: .Ft int .Fn callrpc "char *host" "u_long prognum" "u_long versnum" "u_long procnum" "xdr proc_t inproc" "char *in" "xdrproc_t outproc" "char *out" groff: int callrpc(char *host, u_long prognum, u_long versnum, u_long procnum, xdrproc_t inproc, char *in, xdrproc_t outproc, char *out); mandoc: int callrpc(char *host, u_long prognum, u_long versnum, u_long procnum, xdrproc_t inproc, char *in, xdrproc_t outproc, char *out); i think the indentation in the groff formatting is nicer. jmc -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv