From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Debian-exim@smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9TD7N6Z015859 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:07:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1PBofy-0006ZL-7R; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBofy-0000Tk-6F for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200 Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBofy-0000wv-4Y for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200 Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBofy-00022e-3p for discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Fn issue Message-ID: <20101029130722.GD8651@iris.usta.de> References: <20101029124857.GB13301@kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101029124857.GB13301@kerhand.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Hi Jason, Jason McIntyre wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:48:33PM +0100: > hi. not sure if this is known or not (can;t see anything in the list > that suggests it is). I remember having seen that issue, but apparently neglected to list it. > source, from rpc.3: > > .Ft int > .Fn callrpc "char *host" "u_long prognum" "u_long versnum" "u_long procnum" "xdr proc_t inproc" "char *in" "xdrproc_t outproc" "char *out" > > groff: > int > callrpc(char *host, u_long prognum, u_long versnum, u_long procnum, > xdrproc_t inproc, char *in, xdrproc_t outproc, char *out); > > mandoc: > int > callrpc(char *host, u_long prognum, u_long versnum, u_long procnum, > xdrproc_t inproc, char *in, xdrproc_t outproc, char *out); > > i think the indentation in the groff formatting is nicer. Indeed. I have now added it to the list. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv