From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Debian-exim@smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oARLkXsI001689 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:46:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1PMSbI-0004Az-0b; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:46:32 +0100 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PMSbH-0001KT-Vz; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:46:31 +0100 Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMSbH-0003iO-Ub; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:46:31 +0100 Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PMSbH-0008Qa-N2; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:46:31 +0100 Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:46:31 +0100 From: Ingo Schwarze To: jmc@openbsd.org Cc: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Where to put mandoc roff documentation? Message-ID: <20101127214631.GC27534@iris.usta.de> References: <20101127184503.GA27534@iris.usta.de> <20101127211832.GA27550@kerhand.co.uk> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101127211832.GA27550@kerhand.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi Jason, Jason McIntyre wrote on Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:18:08PM +0000: > it sounds like one page is a good idea for this stuff - roff, troff, > whatever. i wouldn;t worry about squashing a groff page - the port could > be tweaked to install under a different name. > > so i;d say yes, stick 1, 2, and 3 in a roff page. Good, so i shall soon move roff.7 to share/man/man7 and start polishing it such that we can install it once we feel it is ripe. I assume Kristaps won't object to keeping the name either, because he was the one initially choosing it. :) Once we will be installing it, we can then start moving class 1 stuff there. > if there's stuff more suited to mdoc (or repeated), i'd leave it in mdoc > and have roff point to it (i.e. point 4). Oh, yes, pointing that way didn't occur to me yet, but may also be an option for some cases. > we don;t have to worry too much - if it evolves into something else, we > can change it in the future. Good, so let's see where we get. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv