From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [88.198.49.12]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0AMBD9i028815 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0AMBAZS025748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:11:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net; s=dkim200908; t=1294697471; bh=wmGKQtE4Ur8IAxFHsfC0yL2XtyfPqAGML8jXbMD2bwc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SnlA/G6UnpminftPCONk6Dp/qZnD8tXUiGdzICCfuC5CLjT0IB/LkBPw5KXPvB8vo S8q8tMAJFgGm4fAtoo3Kfgj2kVMs2Ukz4aDob5XlOQldUOmXQ+w+Khq79nM6TzQTo6 3JJgkzSQgoe4u2sFtVJTlcrMg/vRH8SkvJTpDCj8= Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:11:10 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Bullets everywhere Message-ID: <20110110221110.GJ23329@acme.spoerlein.net> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hello, prompted by some gratuitous differences in groff vs mandoc output, I wanted to ask for the rationale here (if any). .Bl -bullet .It one .El will print the following raw output: mandoc: o^Ho one groff[1] -Tascii: +^H+^Ho^Ho one groff[1] -Tutf8: ·^H· one groff[2] -Tascii: ^[[1m+^Ho ^[[22mone [1] is groff 1.19.2 (the last GPLv2 release) [2] is groff 1.20.1 HTML output of groff is kinda ridiculous:

one

It's not even using

for the document title ... HTML for mandoc 1.10.9:
  • one
  • Not that bad, except that I think one shouldn't use multiple

    in one document, but that's not the point of this email. Postscript! groff's output is nice (the old one, newer groff has an mdoc error trying to produce postscript, might be my port is broken ...). The bullets are Postscript bullets and `--' dashes also use the correct font symbol. Mandoc however is producing bold `o's as bullets for Postscript ... yuck. So what I'm mostly interested about is the +/o overprinting that groff is trying to do. This won't work on my xterm, obviously. Was this something that older printers could be coaxed into? Or teletypes, of course? Regards, Uli -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv