From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from danbala.tuwien.ac.at (danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.168.64]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8IGOgnr013617 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by danbala.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 116) id 85410391C6C; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:24:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:24:40 +0200 From: Thomas Klausner To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: groff-1.19.2 difference: indent Message-ID: <20110918162440.GA10245@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Nicolas Joly reports a few differences between groff 1.19.2 and 1.11.1. I've verified against 1.11.7, only one of them is still there: ----- Forwarded message from Nicolas Joly ----- 2) In SYNOPSIS, functions with big prototypes are not indented after line wrap, which can occur between argument type and name. Check wborder(3). 20,21c20,21 < wborder(WINDOW *win, chtype ls, chtype rs, chtype ts, chtype bs, < chtype tl, chtype tr, chtype bl, chtype br); --- > wborder(WINDOW *win, chtype ls, chtype rs, chtype ts, chtype bs, chtype > tl, chtype tr, chtype bl, chtype br); ----- End forwarded message ----- Additionally, I've also noticed on this example that "chtype" and "tl" are split across lines. The source for this is: .Fa "chtype tl" I wonder why it's split and not handled as one item? Cheers, Thomas -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv