From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.168.64]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5DB67ep029415 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:06:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 116) id BEEDFA44C; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:06:03 +0200 From: Thomas Klausner To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Cc: David Holland , Kristaps Dzonsons Subject: Re: Extension for more general documents Message-ID: <20140613110603.GB18807@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20140613083536.GJ14438@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <539ABA77.4050305@bsd.lv> <20140613100550.GB27739@iris.usta.de> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140613100550.GB27739@iris.usta.de> Hi Ingo! On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:05:50PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Well, -ms and -me are macro sets just like -man and -mdoc, > so it's not just a matter of taking something away, but a matter > of adding something, that is, defining data structures for abstract > syntax trees for these languages and then adding parsers for these > languages and output modules producing ASCII, HTML, and PostScript > output from the syntax trees. I think it's fine to rewrite these documents to another set of macros, if it provides the features. I'm not sure yet but my assumption for now is that mdoc will fit that role nicely, in most cases. Just to clarify what I'm asking. Thomas -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv