From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.168.64]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5DBj0Jd014340 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:45:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 116) id B1239A44C; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:44:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:44:59 +0200 From: Thomas Klausner To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Cc: David Holland , Kristaps Dzonsons Subject: Re: Extension for more general documents Message-ID: <20140613114459.GN14438@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20140613083536.GJ14438@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <539ABA77.4050305@bsd.lv> <20140613100550.GB27739@iris.usta.de> <20140613110603.GB18807@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140613110603.GB18807@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:06:03PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I think it's fine to rewrite these documents to another set of macros, > if it provides the features. I'm not sure yet but my assumption for > now is that mdoc will fit that role nicely, in most cases. > > Just to clarify what I'm asking. To clarify even further: A Markdown input mode would also be a great alternative. Thomas -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv