From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.stare.cz (mx.stare.cz [79.98.77.229]) by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4baba0ee for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 17:50:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.stare.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id df37c5a6 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:50:29 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: -Wstyle Message-ID: <20180826225029.GA48147@www.stare.cz> Mail-Followup-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) This is mandoc as installed by the current OpenBSD snapshot (amd64). It seems that the order of -T -W resp -W -T does matter: $ mandoc -Tlint -Wstyle *.1 $ mandoc -Wstyle -Tlint *.1 mandoc: radio.1: STYLE: RCS id missing: (OpenBSD) mandoc: rip.1:1:5: STYLE: Mdocdate missing: Dd March (OpenBSD) mandoc: rip.1: STYLE: RCS id missing: (OpenBSD) Is that intentional? Jan -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv