From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.freearts.agency (mail.freearts.agency [51.68.137.137]) by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eb98f518 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: marcin@karpezo.pl) by mail.freearts.agency (Postcow) with ESMTPSA id 8707942E1A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:19:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=karpezo.pl; s=dkim; t=1542637194; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hHr5srUHuBO3lKV4xzIPcsqAFiHP2w2a/RxUEJhC68s=; b=LpPN2OMaTLh6l2QDn13Da5PDht71ood1ExNUtsRugsQZrNRsx7DA05gPSDGiCIOr+RrKDv YU6o6kW67qmTbCdOctd/mpz8+7HPPdU4MhMk6VM32Rq78tqeWJVrs5COCDkwqgocSfMIxV glivzyaLE5W4SF1EM+VEi12WmFKE27mVL/swE2cbes5CjeTE5cdCKyhve5wyaYSiEptKWj iuqyp9ytxlnreuqbr2/NZ4NrNGKvOhqtebm4YgTkmeVbGEapwQaMSAW4h7Tmzgkyj41uVj rCX5+yUDWNdFd601vD7BaPxlHz2YfYitAJtl6vKsDNLQRPTvY0j/WX3a32STNA== Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:19:53 +0100 From: Marcin =?utf-8?B?4oCec2lybWFjaWvigJ0=?= Karpezo To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Bad national charachers renndering in PDF Message-ID: <20181119141953.GC19234@mail.freearts.agency> References: <20181119133105.GA19234@mail.freearts.agency> <340.1542635529@cathet.us> <20181119140639.GC21123@athene.usta.de> X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181119140639.GC21123@athene.usta.de> User-Agent: Microsoft Office/14.0 (Windows NT 6.0; Microsoft Outlook 14.0.4760; Pro) X-PGP-Key: https://sirmacik.net/dl/mkarpezo.asc ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=karpezo.pl; s=dkim; t=1542637194; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hHr5srUHuBO3lKV4xzIPcsqAFiHP2w2a/RxUEJhC68s=; b=K1Z75FRBA3YTP8kbiDLSpG47MQXWUQdBrWey7mzMD3z3Ykwadd9HuJDC34H7ryz4rgqTO7 oCl69PG0Pob+cC2cZID4HaH3uHvMJNtAgzB4n0TbffC8Xt7TxkeY7DEkSjenYS48yU6JoP t7hIyIbHuwn6PnMbTT2PT4fBSkLEZXfWFiJ3VTX3YjOLw+1IB4sw+BbSjN8xS5Cj1L6Sm+ d1tTb2osX16G3wi8f73x+JcRMPJU/VDjxvPBEj0ZxfdkYUV0kLdn5EtoUSHLnwdqAeySUp f5fXk5l6r4qizF4AD/cKOL5mwCXxpdY9rjpdtoQHPcXFz5YnAWWwTvBuTqV8Gg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=karpezo.pl; t=1542637194; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fjr1nN+hakLwbJy5XMPAmvKFc44T5fVydIJU9UPv5uLvTx9g6tPcOOyNnWywVLOvy/cE8cFe00PDEX6qC2iQTBlFpeMe2N59JWfBBQkul/6iZCEEj+l4dPcZs2uy7QmtNbPxgsEzeD5CT+L0GMB0IBFWECFSzR3cswJ11up++zgYEkawDJ2pPOyenibRVxBZmSpdfDDk3T81zebQqNeSxdWz8LJ4wgJKqG8h58B9Z9O6OnCSJej+foKLUsqMz2dKNFha9CynoZlC7/IrXX9/mtry/Scybd5lZUkBXy6jbTBXiHF1XlGI50Fqn/JmcUtuyg5bF/2Hb2VAsr5WRZQ+Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mail.freearts.agency; auth=pass smtp.auth=marcin@karpezo.pl smtp.mailfrom=marcin@karpezo.pl Ingo Schwarze dixit (2018-11-19, 15:06): > Hi Marcin and Anthony, > > Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:52:09AM -0700: > > Marcin Karpezo writes: > > >> I'm having troubles with rendering of Polish charachers in my pdf > >> exports. I've tried every options I've found in man and so on, but > >> without any results. > > > Unfortunately mandoc's PDF output doesn't handle Unicode at all, and > > renders all special characters as ASCII. I am not sure what adding > > such support would entail (there might be font issues?). > > At least that, yes. For PostScript and PDF output, font metrics > for the Times New Roman ASCII font are currently hardcoded in > term_ps.c, the number of supported glyphs is limited to 96 glyphs > per font style, and no other font can be used. Generalizing font > support would be a major undertaking. > > > mandoc is > > great at rendering Unicode in the terminal and in HTML output, but > > getting Unicode in PDF manuals is currently a matter of using some > > other troff implementation. > > That statement is accurate. Groff is to be recommended for that > purpose because it has better mdoc(7) support than other troff > implementations (except mandoc, of course). > > Yours, > Ingo Do you by any chance have some command example to get that from Groff? I've tried several options I've found in manuals and onlie sources but results look worse then mandoc output. Charachers are either printent with fre alphanums or do not printed at all. Marcin -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv