discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@usta.de>
To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
Cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv
Subject: Re: mandoc.css license
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:16:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126171606.GD82448@athene.usta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc48a637-2fdf-26c5-d39c-c12d170f16ea@gmail.com>

Hi Mark,

Mark Harris wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:43:58AM -0800:

> The LICENSE file mentions "all code and documentation contained
> in the mandoc toolkit" so that was the reason for trying to guess
> whether this CSS file was "code".

I see.  The LICENSE file only used that wording in the following
context, though:

  With the exceptions noted below, all code and documentation
  contained in the mandoc toolkit is protected by the Copyright
  of the following developers:

So even if CSS weren't code (i think it is), that would only have
left the authorship / ownership of Copyright of mandoc.css unstated,
the sentence

  The mandoc distribution as a whole is distributed by its developers
  under the following license:

does not have any such qualification.

But i see how the wording could make people ponder unintended subtleties,
so i simplified the wording with the commit below.

Yours,
  Ingo


Log Message:
-----------
Mark Harris pointed out that people might have doubts whether all files
contained in the mandoc toolkit are "code and documentation", and whether
this is of any consequence for licensing, so clarify.

Modified Files:
--------------
    mandoc:
        LICENSE

Revision Data
-------------
Index: LICENSE
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/mandoc/mandoc/LICENSE,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -LLICENSE -LLICENSE -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21
--- LICENSE
+++ LICENSE
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 $Id$
 
-With the exceptions noted below, all code and documentation
-contained in the mandoc toolkit is protected by the Copyright
-of the following developers:
+With the exceptions noted below, all non-trivial files contained
+in the mandoc toolkit are protected by the Copyright of the following
+developers:
 
 Copyright (c) 2008-2012, 2014 Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
 Copyright (c) 2010-2018 Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Copyright (c) 2004 Ted Unangst <tedu@ope
 Copyright (c) 1994 Christos Zoulas <christos@netbsd.org>
 Copyright (c) 2003, 2007, 2008, 2014 Jason McIntyre <jmc@openbsd.org>
 
-See the individual source files for information about who contributed
+See the individual files for information about who contributed
 to which file during which years.
 
 
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26  6:51 Mark Harris
2018-11-26 15:29 ` Ingo Schwarze
2018-11-26 16:43   ` Mark Harris
2018-11-26 17:16     ` Ingo Schwarze [this message]
2018-11-26 17:31       ` Mark Harris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181126171606.GD82448@athene.usta.de \
    --to=schwarze@usta.de \
    --cc=discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv \
    --cc=mark.hsj@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).