From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu [129.13.231.82]) by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1ce05b8f for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de ([172.22.63.82] helo=hekate.usta.de) by scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (envelope-from ) id 1gk2dX-0008Qa-5N; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:02:52 +0100 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1gk2dW-0007Ng-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:02:50 +0100 Received: from athene.usta.de ([172.24.96.10]) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gk2dV-0006Cg-TE; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:02:49 +0100 Received: from localhost (athene.usta.de [local]) by athene.usta.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 0400472e; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:02:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:02:49 +0100 From: Ingo Schwarze To: Pali Rohar Cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: mandoc & perl documentation Message-ID: <20190117080249.GM92206@athene.usta.de> References: <20180913151226.oaon3nvlvgcqioau@pali> <20181011075247.2jo4of7bkpvhkekm@pali> <20181023174545.GD58247@athene.usta.de> <20181024080322.hc6ifwgydpccjif3@pali> <20181025015133.GD20422@athene.usta.de> <20181025081035.qo3i4vrrkm2nwnbf@pali> X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181025081035.qo3i4vrrkm2nwnbf@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Hi Pali, Pali Rohar wrote on Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:10:35AM +0200: > 3) On that https://man.openbsd.org/strict page is section name "strict > refs" fully invisible. It is joined together with previous paragraph and > also with description of that section. Reader does not see that there is > paragraph about "strict refs" section. It should be visually separated. > To compare, look at metacpan page and search for "strict refs". i believe this is one of the issues that got fixed by recent work on HTML and CSS formatting of paragraphs and tagged list items, in particular regarding vertical spacing, see https://man.openbsd.org/strict It now looks better because that work allowed adding these CSS rules (showing a shortened version): .Bl-tag { margin-top: 0.6em; } .Bl-tag > dd { margin-bottom: 0.6em; } It seems that all issues discussed in this mail were now taken care of. Don't hesitate to speak up in case i missed something. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv