From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from scc-mailout-kit-01.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout-kit-01.scc.kit.edu [129.13.231.81]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 942676ae for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 07:19:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de ([172.22.63.82] helo=hekate.usta.de) by scc-mailout-kit-01.scc.kit.edu with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHlG-0004Fh-Ef; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:19:51 +0200 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHlF-0001UY-Ci; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:19:49 +0200 Received: from athene.usta.de ([172.24.96.10]) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHlF-0007JK-8H; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:19:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (athene.usta.de [local]) by athene.usta.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 9b067615; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:19:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:19:49 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: Michal Nowak Cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: mandoc 1.14.5 white space nits Message-ID: <20190702121949.GB53682@athene.usta.de> References: <20190701233416.GJ91131@athene.usta.de> X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Hi Michal, Michal Nowak wrote on Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:18:27AM +0200: > On 07/02/19 01:34 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Nice. I also noted it on >> >> http://mandoc.bsd.lv/ports.html and >> http://mandoc.bsd.lv/porthistory.html > If you could just fix my name to "Michal Nowak" (sic). Thanks. Oops, sorry; that is corrected now. Fortunately, i got your name right in the commit messages, which would have been harder to fix. > Great, thanks for merging them. I wasn't sure if those nits are > something you are interested for future reports. Your are right, that differs among projects. I wouldn't have been in mandoc five years ago because such glitches were still quite numerous in the codebase back then and applying such patches would have been very tedious. Also, such patches would not be useful for OpenBSD at large (outside mandoc or other specific areas where maintainers care) because we normally fix minor glitches only when working on the code anyway. But nowadays, mandoc is mostly clean in this respect, and i'm still actively working on the code quite regularly, so it makes sense to keep it completely clean. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv