From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6c1a7138 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:29:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A784E22036; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:29:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:29:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sgregoratto.me; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=Qdd8LzJPyYvmtsLkHTzw/tqSUJS AtqV1yU8NzDTJr3E=; b=BUFP+7RW47lkxjLYXQKe0Fn8PhabB3MVs5hQN/i/h8q db9HGJm5MY5bN9d7QHPj2AKZrg+ZF+qpw+9WGPYhfNE0cUB9f1GBkKdRSK/tr4Zc ZGJ1ztNzCqK7hzhH2LtCQIoHbdcYhWiGRlbEzh+IpDmIuwl3NWWTqBOr2yvnSxE1 NGrausmqaXJKD4pnIqCE+rJtiwfJs55pjqJs0LGQKiR8NRamtm5PVetTucqB+INf clhLRGM1IsrYSG5Yhq4TD49OX4Do4wQRNW9uQUlHgmG0r3tqtfqA/TZi5t9gAal/ 7E7rUcCS4YOfUid+0Eff2VYviM7BpOgx8pT4QS0tTqg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Qdd8Lz JPyYvmtsLkHTzw/tqSUJSAtqV1yU8NzDTJr3E=; b=WUUYmhnsf7CN3IxIQXO1IE STnHTV7l6nLwHrCvwGErQ4D+NOVC01EXUdAT7Yhz8Odvrscw8oXCG35UO/vQjsBf jR/sK+6pfLqYCEh1j1NsrpaZsO0HyPLLrceSKSD6oLuBDm6+vWicIf7FCpIcvsdF P8aOTkJ6OGTDaFcEFhJ3Se8cAc6k3EAUZx2JKKIlgzyyQOtb4FCEUwgQiyr8cMQX 9FJ6QqzsMZgdYlSPfycqTEmL9jAVO9fJP+1vs2sB9ybJk0ho9XynAJAVHdWAuA5r Wc5uhzulXulL41kIn0wLuSdfDQXco8JANq8cqejxVt0xG7lAvu3HhlPXN1Q6lgvQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrieejgdejfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepufhtvghphhgv nhcuifhrvghgohhrrghtthhouceouggvvhesshhgrhgvghhorhgrthhtohdrmhgvqeenuc fkphepheekrddujeelrdeggedrudejvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguvghvsehsghhrvghgohhrrghtthhordhmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (172.44.179.58.sta.dodo.net.au [58.179.44.172]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5F5D4328005A; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:29:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:29:00 +1100 From: Stephen Gregoratto To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: discrepancy between groff and mandoc for html rendering of wg-quick(8) Message-ID: <20200213042900.2ed2sbhglg5uzjq5@BlackBox> Mail-Followup-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv, "Jason A. Donenfeld" References: <20200212214436.GF20240@athene.usta.de> X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200212214436.GF20240@athene.usta.de> Echoing what Ingo said, it is better form to format code blocks... as a block. That's true of any markup format. So, I took the time to go through wg-quick(8) and fix these sections. I also took the time to "enhance" the rest of the manual by looking at the output of mandoc's mdoc -> man conversion and adjusting accordingly. See the replied patch. -- Stephen Gregoratto -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv