From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19068 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2020 15:28:09 -0000 Received: from bsd.lv (HELO mandoc.bsd.lv) (66.111.2.12) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Jun 2020 15:28:09 -0000 Received: from fantadrom.bsd.lv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 18f1af62 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from magnesium.8pit.net (magnesium.8pit.net [45.76.88.171]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ec70c54e for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:28:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from magnesium.8pit.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by magnesium.8pit.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 07fac070 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:28:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=soeren-tempel.net; h=date :to:subject:from:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=opensmtpd; bh=WoR8e+7tiHpI1Wj7volc kTh1l8c=; b=O4J/6795qojte9U0/UPzeuLNM3VXzUFmWQHpGB6mo9a/OH+h1Y5j VgRgWbpysk8704bKoVrBqm2WufK2+QDt88i4jszc74CT8J1jQ77dFy9LB5Rargcp y8QlPtvIIfuMkc2C5UR1lFA40ETK5djwTHhgTTp+yk+I3IF5BtW3wes= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=soeren-tempel.net; h=date:to :subject:from:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=opensmtpd; b=Y/myx9cKtlH2rx f98cFuLJ3s0VlBds7gmrhk+1iqqFOhldtZeBKqFuxFn4+/r2DysCLlXx+lqWSlje Z3/gThlrthT2j9gU1s3riGE2E/zt/UrAY1G/WhTuy3hPxUDBzOYPAdoEcl20M7i7 srG5v6ko6tRL0NrDdyDGnCiO++9rY= Received: from localhost (ip4d17229f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.23.34.159]) by magnesium.8pit.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b17c2ebd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:YES) for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:17:04 +0200 To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Compatibility with xsltproc? From: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren?= Tempel Message-Id: <3BSFGLBLAOYGW.242OQJ5FBW8XR@8pit.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello there, I am a contributor to the Alpine Linux distribution which uses mandoc-1.14.5 by default. Recently some man page rendering issues were reported in our bug tracker [0]. Upon further investigation I found these incorrectly rendered man pages to be generated using xsltproc(1) and xmlto(1). I searched the mailing list archives as well as the documentation and TODO list for specific entries regarding xsltproc(1) and didn't manage to find any specific mentions. I also checked the xsltproc(1) man page on OpenBSD to make sure that this problem isn't Alpine specific and the xsltproc(1) man page itself seems to be rendered incorrectly on OpenBSD as well. Are rendering issues related to man pages generated using xsltproc(1) a known issue? Is there any know workaround, e.g. specific flags which can be= passed to xsltproc(1) to make the generated man pages compatible with mandoc? Greetings, S=C3=B6ren [0]: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/11674 -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv