From: Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
To: "discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv" <discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv>
Subject: OT: Vt vs. Ft/Fn (WAS: Giving up on emulating SYNOPSIS vspace.)
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:13:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0E09BC.9040900@bsd.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100608000646.GE8550@iris.usta.de>
>>> 2) global variables
>>> -------------------
>>> Consider /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/svc.3:
>>>
>>> .Ft int
>>> .Fn svc_destroy "SVCXPRT *xprt"
>>> .Ft struct pollfd *
>>> .Fa svc_pollfd ;
>>> .Ft int
>>> .Fa svc_max_pollfd ;
>>> .Ft fd_set
>>> .Fa svc_fdset ;
>>> .Ft fd_set
>>> .Fa *__svc_fdset ;
>>> .Ft int
>>> .Fa __svc_fdsetsize ;
>>> .Ft int
>>> .Fa svc_fds ;
>>> .Ft int
>>> .Fn svc_freeargs "SVCXPRT *xprt" "xdrproc_t inproc" "char *in"
> [...]
> Right, and i tried that, but being documented is not the same as
> being in working order. This is what both old and new grow spit out
> when you switch to .Vt/.Va:
I'd meant just `Vt' instead of Vt/Va, forming
int
svc_destroy(SVCXPRT *xprt);
struct pollfd * svc_pollfd;
int svc_max_pollfd;
fd_set svc_fdset;
fd_set *__svc_fdset;
int __svc_fdsetsize;
int svc_fds;
int
svc_freeargs(SVCXPRT *xprt, xdrproc_t inproc, char *in);
from, e.g.,
.Vt struct pollfd * svc_pollfd ;
mdoc.samples documents `Vt' as doing funny business in SYNOPSIS, not
`Va' (wtf?). From what I understand, Vt's the conventional way of
putting variables in the SYNOPSIS. `F' macros are certainly not the way.
jmc, wiz, any suggestions and/or observations? I like Ingo's notation
of `Vt/Va'. I've never seen it before (mdocml's manuals use `Vt'
standalone as suggested in mdoc.samples), but you know better.
I think we can take this opportunity, in mdoc.7, to specify how
variables should get documented in the SYNOPSIS. And what about the
following:
- CPP defines?
- structs Vt's? (the `Bd' was used in one of your examples)
We have `Dv' for defines, but that doesn't help me with wanting to print
out `.Dv #define FOOBAR'.
>> Can you commit fixes to BSD.lv as well?
>
> Er, frankly, no, i meant i'm going commit your reorg, i don't have
> patches for the issues (1) and (2) yet. But as this concerns a very
> small number of pages and all that goes awry is a few missing
> blank lines, we can add these patches whenever we have them.
Ah, I see... The above patches are easy enough to come by, so long as
we settle on the Right Way of doing it.
Thanks again,
Kristaps
--
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-06 23:18 Giving up on emulating SYNOPSIS vspace Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-06-06 23:42 ` Jason McIntyre
2010-06-07 11:12 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-06-07 23:26 ` Ingo Schwarze
2010-06-07 23:42 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-06-08 0:06 ` Ingo Schwarze
2010-06-08 9:13 ` Kristaps Dzonsons [this message]
2010-06-08 10:02 ` OT: Vt vs. Ft/Fn (WAS: Giving up on emulating SYNOPSIS vspace.) Thomas Klausner
2010-06-08 12:06 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-06-12 18:05 ` Vt vs. Ft/Fn Ingo Schwarze
2010-06-07 0:35 ` Giving up on emulating SYNOPSIS vspace Ingo Schwarze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0E09BC.9040900@bsd.lv \
--to=kristaps@bsd.lv \
--cc=discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).