From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o76Ia1cZ014454 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460E114F10A for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:35:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0O8TK3qOt3J3 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:35:45 +0200 (CEST) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [85.8.60.193] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv X-KTH-rcpt-to: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Received: from lappy.bsd.lv (h85-8-60-193.dynamic.se.alltele.net [85.8.60.193]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5258814D79E for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:35:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C5C55FA.8050401@bsd.lv> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:35:38 +0200 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080812) X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: -column issue References: <20100806070614.GD2107@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C5C417B.4050209@bsd.lv> <20100806175200.GB946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C5C50C2.7080304@bsd.lv> <20100806182329.GC946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100806182329.GC946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:13:22PM +0200, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote: >>> Second level name Type Changeable >>> FS_POSIX_SETUID No integer yes >>> >>> i.e. it does not parse "No". mandoc does not display the "No". same if i >>> move the "No" into the next column (which seems more logical). >> Jason, I can't replicate this. Enclosed is the input (so as to preserve >> the tabbing...). I tested with OpenBSD and a new groff. Do you still >> see this behaviour? >> >> Kristaps > > > hmm. so the reason was that you used "No", where i used > "No". and the extra space is as you explained previously about > lining up the columns correctly, and the way mandoc handles -column > lists, yes? > > so, it seems non-intuitive. i would expect to do sth like this: > > FS_POSIX_SETUIDNointegeryes > > mandoc handles it, but groff does not. sigh. > > so, do you recommend i "fix" sysctl.3? Oomf, I hadn't noticed that. Both old and new groff do indeed print out the `No'. I fail to understand this one. Let me see if I can think of a more elegant solution... but somehow I doubt it. -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv