From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7THQU80001655 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B33314D870; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([130.237.32.160]) by mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id RXuxY81QKMvH; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:23 +0200 (CEST) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [85.8.61.196] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv Received: from lappy.cust.alltele.se (h85-8-61-196.dynamic.se.alltele.net [85.8.61.196]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5093314D7D5; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7A983C.3000900@bsd.lv> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:20 +0200 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100318) X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv CC: Thomas Klausner Subject: Re: mdoc.7: tweak skeleton file References: <4C797BBE.7060500@bsd.lv> <20100828220118.GE25626@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C7988EC.2050603@bsd.lv> <20100828223857.GH25626@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <4C79986D.6050801@bsd.lv> <20100829091037.GA10462@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <20100829105032.GD12803@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <20100829113310.GB10462@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> <20100829120937.GF12803@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <20100829161701.GC10462@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100829161701.GC10462@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > well, there is nothing to say we have to move it at all. it can stay in the > place it always was. > > however for openbsd, the choice is not so important - we currently don;t > have EXIT STATUS, so as far as workload goes, it's irrelevant where we add > it. > > i personally think it is best placed immediately after DESCRIPTION, > where it always was. please let us not just think about what posix does > when making this decision. i'd welcome feedback from any freebsd people > at this point - maybe there was a good reason for the change. > > anyway, my diff below should make us match (almost) for mdoclint. note > that you need to make "IMPLEMENTATION NOTES" defined for netbsd only, > and "EXIT STATUS" now not os-specific. > > let me know what you want to do about section placement. Note that Ruslan, whom I understand does a lot of FreeBSD manual stuff, isn't part of this list. So if you want to involve him, you'll have to CC him... -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv