From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26239 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2022 17:55:19 -0000 Received: from bsd.lv (HELO mandoc.bsd.lv) (66.111.2.12) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Mar 2022 17:55:19 -0000 Received: from fantadrom.bsd.lv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9ae70f01 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:55:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-oa1-f50.google.com (mail-oa1-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 99e03058 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:55:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oa1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-ddfa38f1c1so11156541fac.11 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anjbe-name.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:comments:mime-version :content-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=sDipLVZAYTPtqJwwAlRYo617wpGrpCrYPs8E/wMplXY=; b=WOQKg3/wLYkRk7vqIWskOYghF45dTFQzvru+s+H8OD+Ly3OrmbFmRh+Gb1/ah7MBkQ cgx6shZeMeOO4SPR6wS0UTgd+fHIZvJuUIijT41PWHZRsQEerJeSm4aG+4QonPeYRqz2 H1GDOvlNBpuIjchG8S0GCJOkeLXOEZQkcBh4cFRSWU+kUfAC9EjIDR64En9xa366MJXj iiRUY/RqihJs02U78qleKQeV17dsC2AzmM4uM0MJAZ/yszdJKfUFVe0jQb496GV6call VkKNhT51m9GlNHVZJ6Arxn8knH3nUm48zIF3EuQB4tDf6lJTSLn5ytm/5cQ98WaPDnjO XF8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :comments:mime-version:content-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :message-id; bh=sDipLVZAYTPtqJwwAlRYo617wpGrpCrYPs8E/wMplXY=; b=6B2cWI4uw09coyew7NV7itM08lzZNOPqcyjQb2TdH4XHCLsvo322bke8VMJoXfl0oV OkEG/bgefu+iN1Jel5Ih6GbVicSTcYEf+4CuvKQ7zn890nh6dcWkvZgR2lIn3+/1SX9Z RpW2+tF5Z5K5E/fn3m6I/9HS1q77ehaUZZtqvl7oJ6tzsyq3LyMNiDiJ5OM1/n5R2fJz dSh+yZ/6o6LkOVH9fvwEykfdNVUEk3XvVl3afo1iR/iTWagL0E+P+1vqhCGHPlxNDf6F /HEjB+S1SZu2lM5z04ny2tc6Ckn+Ly23F4b8hFb696AP7OCY1Auh15aD790xkG0hgYGH TUtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vQkK6C3OZ+X+f8Ln4xpSohUGsg1FS3im2Bf9B/QyeI4Q28o+o a1Zjtl0GexgtrImkL/GWtRh2Qg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK+u7qgls+w+HfSNADAwaHtmjT1uU/F8PnHOXzbNljeCMW6SosIc6Cq5RyIgGaJJzbwXm/1A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:c1c2:b0:dd:a7c0:b655 with SMTP id i2-20020a056870c1c200b000dda7c0b655mr7551553oad.107.1648317315500; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desktop.ajb.soy (c-174-56-122-129.hsd1.nm.comcast.net. [174.56.122.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13-20020a4ae58d000000b00324dfcc5bcfsm1252359oov.12.2022.03.26.10.55.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desktop.ajb.soy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by desktop.ajb.soy (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d661684a; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:55:13 -0600 (MDT) From: "Anthony J. Bentley" To: Ingo Schwarze cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: HTML output: section headers with diacritics not in table of contents In-reply-to: References: <10474-1648225308.014815@KUMT.SLa5.YYhl> Comments: In-reply-to Ingo Schwarze message dated "Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:33:28 +0100." X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <94657.1648317313.1@desktop.ajb.soy> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:55:13 -0600 Message-ID: <50325-1648317313.709340@li8c.ggMJ.xEbA> Hi Ingo, Ingo Schwarze writes: > All the same, before starting work on an implementation, i would > also appreciate your opinion, Anthony (and possibly of similarly > prolific users and maintainers in other operating systems) whether > such functionality seems desirable to you, because i feel like > sitting on the fence myself. As a user, I was mildly surprised to learn Mandoc limits URL fragments to ASCII; I would expect it to create UTF-8 fragments seamlessly. So consider me in favor of such a change. In fact, if it’s workable, I would also like to be able to use UTF-8 tags in less(1) as well. -- Anthony J. Bentley -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv