From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [130.237.48.193]); by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6e1fb76b; for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:18:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51AE25DA for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jLH_z-RrwIqq for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:01 +0100 (CET) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [90.38.46.58] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv X-KTH-rcpt-to: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Received: from pc3.home (AToulouse-651-1-231-58.w90-38.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.38.46.58]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8764CED1 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:17:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54EDE7A2.9020001@bsd.lv> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:17:54 +0100 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: texi2mdoc References: <54EB47BE.6000608@bsd.lv> <20150223165627.GA13719@k8> <54EB63EA.4080702@bsd.lv> <20150223181739.GA9706@k8> In-Reply-To: <20150223181739.GA9706@k8> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, All of the raised concerns are part of the new release, 0.1.2. http://mdocml.bsd.lv/texi2mdoc This release focusses on macros, which now work in the same weird and mysterious way as stipulated (sometimes erroneously!) in the texinfo manual. I now splice macros and values directly into the input stream instead of independently parsing them. As usual, I regularly test now on the OpenBSD GNU manuals, GSL, texlive, GMP, the autotools suite, and so forth. They all look pretty good. Huge, but good. I now catch all of the macros in these pages except for some that seem to be errors in the documents, e.g., @sample{} instead of @samp{}. The mdoc output still isn't awesome in terms of overzelous `Pp', but mandoc is able to churn through the superfluousness so easily... Best, Kristaps -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv