From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [130.237.48.193]); by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3ba38ddf; for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:05:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5BA289 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:05:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qXxwxAUCPE4a for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:05:33 +0100 (CET) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [103.5.142.25] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv X-KTH-rcpt-to: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Received: from skins.local (unknown [103.5.142.25]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76A1C25FB for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:05:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54FFF740.3080201@bsd.lv> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:05:20 +0900 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Linking in mdoc(7) References: <54FC74F4.9090200@bsd.lv> <20150309110908.gN5E-QPE%sdaoden@yandex.com> <20150309114648.GA18431@athene.usta.de> <54FD9156.2010201@bsd.lv> <54FDBE04.9030108@bsd.lv> <20150310163053.I3TjLbTZ%sdaoden@yandex.com> In-Reply-To: <20150310163053.I3TjLbTZ%sdaoden@yandex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Steffen, I don't understand these problems. In mandoc(1), the previously enclosed patch completely implements the `Ix' functionality, both in terms of `Sx' and the nascent (badly named?) `Lkx'. It works. I've been using it happily to build index tables and chapter references that jump to functions, etc., etc. As for groff, can't it just (via doc.tmac) throw away the `Ix' arguments and that's that? And if we want an `Lkx' (which I strongly advise for arbitrary link names), it can be a duplicate of `Lk'. grohtml can't even link `Sx' and `Sh': it just italices the arguments to the former! (This may have changed in recent groff.) So if it ignores `Ix' and continues in doing what it already does with `Sx', what exactly is the loss? Best, Kristaps -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU//dAAAoJEMT2SUY9XBESJ/IP/i8FgiUB4BI+Z2KaDTM9ROww 3VHizu22FmpfLuzzjlj5QvyzRqT8H6K/aMHwzI7n20qMDekneUkNpLmkb29FHrC1 vJl57on9wXJGeQMfSSzBjpQPNGoud5Ag0e5eK9qcrvOufANB2lCi9KOKhqt0Pjk8 +dg+so3DXCf40XTSzxWgr5HzMFWFZgONZuhHfDfUMwhwjqZPx8O9w1suNfvCkcAS czFe1j1mssBC7G2KBWmZI4J6yIlzC3rGZcEk5sxzlSsnuxeymcuLYXiZ8QV0qQAm UslqF74W5d84oU5XHfN1NZUZjrEbbC93DvM/m92KYD09E3Zr9p8qR1nTHN6mTKda ieO415F98EvCIC3AwukgaxzgC09g+B95nhVCV2NZhTRYO2vr7XXhUPM80ZRzLumI TU8c6KR5gAk7ou17xj8kdFugVjxC8uu8kRzwmgqZw2Oog7ZRJAH7UV+9DWwrX6Lx XMKDagwhGpv16I+wl97548APCdjj2XpanGNrnhZV3jKDZamQNCOaXfvGOA+86Zdh bvlw5LqeST5oTiVzFbuLRmxiFu7BmBNrfhYNNAQPqgI+s0JKToFjgPUV6LCYwg/y rUJxNu/bB8QOxvQ8D0/Qcw2M2JmQRxe6YCVoS8JjurDV6aMpXeNyLWYjjf5StIaA C4bDmDAuaB2iuWTSNg2/ =BW6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv