From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a15884fd for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:39:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D770C80B6; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D2F34D38; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:39:56 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Ingo Schwarze Cc: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Dashes and strange markup References: <86wpc2ac39.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170306155714.GB58385@athene.usta.de> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:39:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170306155714.GB58385@athene.usta.de> (Ingo Schwarze's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:57:14 +0100") Message-ID: <86h936pdes.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) X-Mailinglist: mdocml-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ingo Schwarze writes: > Well, abusing .Nd outside NAME is so bizarre that being forgiving > about it would be a bad idea. Technically, mandoc *is* forgiving about it: it renders it the way the author (incorrectly) expected instead of throwing an error, which is probably why it has gone unnoticed until now. > Anthony correctly answered the rest, so my impression is that no > code or documentation changes are required. I asked for advice, not changes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv