From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b845ccef for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:34:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5f7551d6 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:32:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=uc+jMPx7MJkiZcZ3zxCWF9OkDPo=; b=HuGVto jJWF06c+pSBlbWGlWQx6WEVlUHo4CjWCDOK9SFKcW5KA4gzyVOthBEiRLJsDXNRM O9mxvUtZYs3fIpUCb82scc6sGad42SZFXds/QB+NcoGvWG72pT0ZgYBVyCFpRv8S 00M6HR6tSVN4J12S0I78r9ODz/M0bpvdh72Iek4lceSB6egydpeIkdjJ34KgeaMM cN3WpDs4af+OPn5kHhwsWqKrqheLRFkAAduxrmg2MCClmrw2AtJX0S5XQFA9Smz+ MAJI8G4st0lqLcGyWv4D/OjjycvssHwpzs0U/feAACfQqwCYBma4wDXY/yOiqNHA F9Zvv/PDHbAkdk0g== Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id f2024a99 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b18so6197017otp.0 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:34:42 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWD+Ak+jZbJjfUUTNNTVGjrAn/G13219KJrRzYzvRt8WSlVXgA8 r4HTVxkvyFNux9L0BFrPC4rXJlmnd9ta/PbLlbQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTHiNlRMPfChpgsPZj/CfYWHMM4VQl74xG4MY51B7Lt/uOGkqk/KyJ4rIacSWL15Ursk0DmI90cnVLsBGzP5E= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:811:: with SMTP id 17mr14484570oty.369.1581611681321; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:34:41 -0800 (PST) X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200212214436.GF20240@athene.usta.de> In-Reply-To: <20200212214436.GF20240@athene.usta.de> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:34:30 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: discrepancy between groff and mandoc for html rendering of wg-quick(8) To: Ingo Schwarze Cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Ingo, On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:44 PM Ingo Schwarze wrote: > The commit appended below fixes the bug. Great! Thanks so much for fixing. I forwarded your email to a debian fella. Maybe they'll apply it to whatever they're using. > Besides, while the following man(7) code in wg-quick(8) isn't incorrect, > it isn't good style either: Indeed the manual wg-quick.8 and wg.8 files are really grotesque. I write latex but not groff and wasn't sure which conventions to use. Any cleanup help is greatly appreciated! Thanks for the suggestions you provided. > (Bold face isn't really needed in an example either, but oh well...) It is. In this case, it's showing a wg(8)-style config file with two wg-quick(8) additions. The additions are made bold to distinguish them. Thanks a bunch, Jason -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv