From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20871 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2022 18:18:39 -0000 Received: from bsd.lv (HELO mandoc.bsd.lv) (66.111.2.12) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Apr 2022 18:18:39 -0000 Received: from fantadrom.bsd.lv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 08fcef6b for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 13:18:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu [129.13.231.82]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 982ffc2f for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 13:18:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from hekate.asta.kit.edu ([2a00:1398:5:f401::77]) by scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (envelope-from ) id 1ndFfO-000wLT-9H; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 20:18:34 +0200 Received: from login-1.asta.kit.edu ([2a00:1398:5:f400::72]) by hekate.asta.kit.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ndFfM-004IC0-7W; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 20:18:32 +0200 Received: from schwarze by login-1.asta.kit.edu with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndFfM-0001dW-KA; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 20:18:32 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 20:18:32 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: Abigail G Cc: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: man.cgi doesn't find symlinked manpages Message-ID: References: X-Mailinglist: mandoc-discuss Reply-To: discuss@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Helli Abigail, Abigail G wrote on Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 11:59:03AM -0400: > Looks like there was an issue with the fix for our binary package > repository to manpage database/file-tree program that caused symlinks > not to be written. With that fixed, looking up symlinked manpages works > fine. Heh, no wonder i scratched my head trying to figure out what the problem might be. I'm glad to learn nothing is broken in man.cgi(8) in this respect. > Thanks for the troubleshooting tips! You are very welcome! Do stay in contact and don't hesitate to tell us about your experience with mandoc and man.cgi on your servers. I guess sooner or later, you will run into something that can be improved on the mandoc side, whatever it may then turn out to be. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv