From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Debian-exim@smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5RH44LU008376 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:04:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1OSvH1-0004Ub-UK; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:04:04 +0200 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OSvH1-0000h2-TQ for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:04:03 +0200 Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSvH1-0001y4-Sh for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:04:03 +0200 Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OSvH1-0001hY-Rz for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:04:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:04:03 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: mdocml: Basic implementation of .Bk/.Ek; from OpenBSD. Message-ID: <20100627170403.GJ19398@iris.usta.de> References: <201006270126.o5R1QL1S015718@krisdoz.my.domain> <4C271923.6070407@bsd.lv> <20100627143401.GB19398@iris.usta.de> <4C2783A3.5050502@bsd.lv> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C2783A3.5050502@bsd.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Hi Kristaps, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote on Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:00:19PM +0200: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> So, here is a patch to >> * not print invalid arguments verbatim (no groffs prints them, either) As documented in mdoc(7). >> * not trigger TERMP_PREKEEP twice >> * not die from invlid arguments (groff won't die, either) >> * continue to ignore even valid arguments (just like groff) > Is this in line with the mdoc.7 changes you submitted? Yes, the first one is documented, the others are implementation details subject to change and do not warrant documenting. > I'm just sayin'... > Other than that, ok kristaps. Thanks for looking! > Also, can you give any insight into fitting this into mdoc_html.c? I guess we should just ignore it! What is the meaning of "keeping text on the same line" in HTML anyway? HTML is not a typesetting language... ;) Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv