From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from scc-mailout.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout.scc.kit.edu [129.13.185.202])
	by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p64MjLdQ002887
	for <tech@mdocml.bsd.lv>; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:45:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82])
	by scc-mailout-02.scc.kit.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1)
	id 1QdrtI-0002qE-0S; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:45:20 +0200
Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3])
	by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <schwarze@usta.de>)
	id 1QdrtI-0003zA-1L
	for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:45:20 +0200
Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de)
	by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <schwarze@usta.de>)
	id 1QdrtH-0001lk-W6
	for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:45:20 +0200
Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <schwarze@usta.de>)
	id 1QdrtH-0007fq-VE
	for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:45:19 +0200
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:45:19 +0200
From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@usta.de>
To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
Subject: sync results
Message-ID: <20110704224519.GC28684@iris.usta.de>
X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech
Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi Kristaps,

i'm currently syncing from bsd.lv to openbsd.org.
The code looks good, and in the output, i see many improvements,
so i will now commit the sync.


However, there are also a three tiny regressions:

cvs(1) contains this code:

.TP 1i
\fB?\fP \fIfile\fP
\fIfile\fP is in your working directory, but does not correspond to
anything in the source repository, and is not in the list of files
for \fBcvs\fP to ignore (see the description of the \fB\-I\fP option).
.PP
.RS .5i
.sp
Use the
.B \-A
option to reset any sticky tags, dates, or
.B \-k
options.  (If you get a working copy of a file by using one of the

Now doubtless, .PP .RS .sp in a row is horrible.
However, with groff and old mandoc, that gave one blank line.
Now there are two.


lynx(1) contains this code:

.TP
.B \-cookie_file\fR=\fIFILENAME
specifies a file to use to read cookies.

In groff and old mandoc, the indent of "specifies" relative to "-cookie"
was 7, now it is 5.


nsd-xfer(8) contains this code:

.SH "OPTIONS"
.LP 
.TP
.B \-4
Only send to IPv4 addresses.

In groff and old mandoc, there is no blank line after OPTIONS,
now there is one.


Note this is the first time that i managed to use the whole OpenBSD
base tree (3725 distinct pages) for doing regression checks after a
merge, and the above is all i found.

Yours,
  Ingo
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv