From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from scc-mailout.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout.scc.kit.edu [129.13.185.202]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBS0bnQu017406 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:37:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from hekate.usta.de (asta-nat.asta.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.63.82]) by scc-mailout-02.scc.kit.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1) id 1RfhWe-0004zT-I2; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:48 +0100 Received: from donnerwolke.usta.de ([172.24.96.3]) by hekate.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RfhWe-0005ST-N7 for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:48 +0100 Received: from iris.usta.de ([172.24.96.5] helo=usta.de) by donnerwolke.usta.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RfhWe-00062x-LS for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:48 +0100 Received: from schwarze by usta.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RfhWe-0008M8-Ba for tech@mdocml.bsd.lv; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:48 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:47 +0100 From: Ingo Schwarze To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: do not skip manuals shared across architectures Message-ID: <20111228003747.GA30880@iris.usta.de> References: <20111226114827.GG11624@iris.usta.de> <4EFA5C13.6010504@bsd.lv> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EFA5C13.6010504@bsd.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi Kristaps, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote on Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:00:19AM +0200: > On 26/12/2011 13:48, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> You want this on bsd.lv, too? > Yes, please commit. Done, thanks. > Can you also document these checks in mandocdb(8) so people can > know more or less what `-t' is checking for? In the long run, yes, i think that makes sense. Right now, these checks are still too volatile. I'm not looking forward to rewriting the docs multiple times. I think the right time will be after the first round of dealing with fallout from the base builds has been completed - this commit was just the first of this round, several more are required for polishing - *and* after a careful comparison against espie@'s OpenBSD::Makewhatis modules has been completed. At that point, i hope for the tests to become more or less stable. Yours, Ingo -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv