From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [88.198.49.12])
	by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4J1wwS2026041
	for <tech@mdocml.bsd.lv>; Sat, 18 May 2013 21:59:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1])
	by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r4J1wuX7040893
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <tech@mdocml.bsd.lv>; Sun, 19 May 2013 03:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net;
	s=dkim200908; t=1368928737;
	bh=Uc5FpL3Ropebm3NMrvEVPjVwtGycfjXe+xTfTst/NLQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=DPCeExg0BippwPjD2K7IegqjQ1wV3bcLssbJg3E1kVVNXSHn1GeiuRRO8IKoiCvIs
	 n0yo05MKzFs+FPGKgTjelnfXbUiOK+1pYzKBird51x4XuzRKpN6U+GQvmR7X4T3zoE
	 WB4wWPjOg+6m95gi5ejMlzA2qrgmJsdFvFKfKFcU=
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 03:58:56 +0200
From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@spoerlein.net>
To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
Subject: Re: [patch] fix wrong argument for calloc
Message-ID: <20130519015855.GI2055@acme.spoerlein.net>
References: <20130517002910.GX2055@acme.spoerlein.net>
 <20130518164545.GC30629@iris.usta.de>
X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech
Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20130518164545.GC30629@iris.usta.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 18:45:45 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> Ulrich Spörlein wrote on Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:29:10AM +0200:
> 
> > simple patch, please commit.
> 
> Done, both to bsd.lv and openbsd.org.
> 
> > This was found by Coverity Scan CID 978734,
> 
> Hummm...  Please bear with my ignorance...
> How can anybody do anything with the CID?
> Is the CID really useful without a project ID?
> Is there a database somewhere on the net?

Sorry, got to this mail only now. These IDs are unique on
http://scan.coverity.com which is where Open Source projects can sign up
to have Coverity scan their stuff.

The FreeBSD project used to run their own instance of Coverity Prevent
(so with local IDs, not global ones), but I'm trying to get us on the
coverity-run instance, which should scale easier and lessen the
bus-factor on our side.

NetBSD is on there too, maybe OpenBSD should consider doing this as
well.

If you create an account and request access to the FreeBSD project, I
should be able to give that to you. But they currently migrate their
website and some stuff seems broken.

Cheers,
Uli
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv