From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]); by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id beb3224b; for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:32:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so78566wgg.4 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SXfiG8s4Jn6fwtu84705FE9X8JhPLtKGP2l0TKBGEQU=; b=sg3IMgJaJ4oJbaZMw8ZKRGJcfsx3tof+ag+PLpIpqsLtkVFR8C2puXQ8TuM1XC4oMu A7NgF6zjrukSqORLr63hvc8z9WN+zddGrXJQldB1n1w55xsiwyExeyyKtSv3mBxQpFeO iZUpHWpPq265LZezhlSJYEPg1WdcbyfKr7jGPKH8Sf41X6J8rOfqkv7KOXscORh6U0aS Syp5mx3SxyAjff37fuBx5xXS4dIcOccq52oXwzxAZb/SpOciZzzHR4eMZBudPbopgbg0 lKfqA7LgaKujd3Ui9fL+1lWlxUH0gD+EzUTDJYut9tyNz/M3jMvahmowOWG3uxHXT0Vx qtVA== X-Received: by 10.194.143.12 with SMTP id sa12mr33109232wjb.101.1421911955890; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from kei ([46.114.151.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h2sm1864901wix.5.2015.01.21.23.32.34 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:32:31 +0100 From: Alexis To: Ingo Schwarze , Kristaps Dzonsons Cc: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Allow configure variables to be set from environment Message-ID: <20150122073231.GB1198@kei> References: <20150116215840.GF740@kei.fritz.box> <20150117010706.GH9772@iris.usta.de> <54BAC1A2.2060907@bsd.lv> <20150118033335.GA16562@iris.usta.de> <20150120151501.GA97151@kei> <20150121230518.GF11796@iris.usta.de> <54C042A0.6080806@bsd.lv> <20150122003556.GJ11796@iris.usta.de> X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150122003556.GJ11796@iris.usta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Hi Ingo, hi Kristaps, > > Alexis, you said that the homebrew folks don't like patching > > software. But there must be a facility to do so, no? > > Shouldn't this patch be there, and not upstream? Yes, there is a facility in Homebrew to apply custom patches. >From my experience the maintainers want those patches to be very specific to Homebrew and encourage changes to be reported and made upstream. > I'm not quite sure that is better. If we have the patch in our > tree, the risk that future code changes turn the patch into > something that actually *does* become a security risk seems > lower. > > Also note that mdocml.bsd.lv *is* the portable version of mandoc, > so in the way, it is the right place to maintain such code - as > long as it doesn't grow out of hand and obscure the code. I agree with Ingo here. Best, Alexis -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv