From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kerhand.co.uk (mail.kerhand.co.uk [91.135.5.67]) by fantadrom.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 290a64ff for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:04:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kerhand.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8fc03257 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:04:40 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kerhand.co.uk; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=M3L Pe0KLzxsIWRlvoXgO/2l51cQ=; b=Z769Fz4UxQj0BDPhbj9oF8mOML5rSpws5ry +6UrGC213vdq4GQOju+c7DX+ztS5HBIhfjT3vcaUglPdtkSCfVRbMxvTYOhWJp28 lBT5Tlo2K77Qvj1jKVItcs8404OxR4+E3FJysuEjV2Oc0vvT2ZymayVk/fZn+KQb QAiProUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=kerhand.co.uk; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=dkim; b= fH3Byo1C28f4pyywKva3hJkLtwx45a24qYQU/Lze+z20puRsTIOp3+YtbcOGFSzW Gcv2dNMZB+1J6NKP6K9X7RLusdY8VjfKVHvlV+7UYmEoXLEVLHJezdzus79DXWIh j2tayoQJ3zIBG4NjOv9z1HuSkn2N5dhPOW1uRiPFf5g= Received: from harkle (harkle [192.168.1.5]) by mail.kerhand.co.uk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 76b965cd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:04:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (harkle [local]) by harkle (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 28b11b0d for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:04:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:04:40 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: tech@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: [jmc@kerhand.co.uk: Re: -isoC-2017 patch] Message-ID: <20180729150439.GA10187@harkle> X-Mailinglist: mandoc-tech Reply-To: tech@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) resending now ingo agrees i may spam you all! jmc ----- Forwarded message from Jason McIntyre ----- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:51:20 +0100 From: Jason McIntyre To: maya@netbsd.org Cc: tech@mandoc.bsd.lv, guenther@openbsd.org Subject: Re: -isoC-2017 patch On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 04:11:46PM +0000, maya@netbsd.org wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 05:49:44PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > > like C11 > > > > After looking at the draft, it seems to me that there will likely > > even be fewer references to C18 than to C11, given that C11 did > > define a small number of new features, which at least in theory > > might get implemented and documented. > > Off the top of my head, C11 adds atomics, generics and threads. it's > pretty big. i kind of agree with ingo's plan to see if it will be used by more than just two or three pages before adding a macro. jmc ----- End forwarded message ----- -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv