From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4I7brgU006490 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 01:37:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F014DC52 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:37:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Yh4ElDwm9KPx for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:37:46 +0200 (CEST) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [85.8.61.223] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv X-KTH-rcpt-to: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Received: from lappy.bsd.lv (h85-8-61-223.dynamic.se.alltele.net [85.8.61.223]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E8414D86A for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BF2442F.5020704@bsd.lv> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39:27 +0200 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080812) X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "tech@mdocml.bsd.lv" Subject: Re: .Bl and .Pp References: <20100517220042.GA21819@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <20100517220042.GA21819@britannica.bec.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > looking over the current list I get only parse errors from > groff_mdoc.man now. One set is about using .Bl -column without .It and > that I will fix. Hm, hold off on this one, as it will be fixed as part of my forthcoming fixes for `It' in a `Bl -column' to open directly into the body. The beginning of this is already in place, namely, allowing parent `Bl' nodes to cache their type. Then I'll define `Ta' as a true macro, and it just falls into place with that. > The second one is about using .Pp inside .Bl. I think > that should be allowed to add line breaks. What do you think? You mean before an `It'? Note that with `-column' allowing multiple lines, I have to run a filter for disallowing block children. Bleh. > The file also shows another issue. > > .Bl -tag -compact > .Sm off > .It ... > .Sm on > .El > > triggers the assertion in mdoc_action.c:618 (post_bl_tagwidth). > > I think we have to explicitly scan forward until we find an .It child, > but what do you think? Will look into it... -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv